There is no history. There is only biography.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson (1839)
In many ways, Emily Dickinson’s poems have become her biography. Over the past century, many literary critics have explored Dickinson’s content, form, and style. One of the topics for debate has been whether some or all of her poems could be considered “letters” rather than “poems.” Perhaps they are both.
No doubt long after you are a student my Jr. English class, you will read and study Dickinson’s works. Some of you, in response to a requirement; others for pleasure.
I would like you to take about thirty minutes to explore the Dickinson Electronic Archives. Read a short biography about her. Read some of the responses to her work, or read Martha Nell Smith’s essay about Dickinson’s “letter poems.”
Using this digital source or another that you find, read a few of Dickinson’s poems that we will not cover in class. Find one that you would consider a “letter” rather than a traditional poem. Cut and paste the poem in your blog response and explain in 4-5 sentences what drew you to the poem and why this poem in particular reminds you of a personal letter more than a poem.
As writers, both Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman responded to the American culture of the late 19th and early 20th centuries in a decidedly different manner than their contemporaries or American writers before them. While their writings are in some ways biographic, in other ways their works reveal much about the history and culture of this period in America history.
Whether history or biography, letter or poem, take the time to relax and enjoy what these great literary figures have to offer.
Please post your response by 7:00 am on Thursday, November 19th.
photo attribution: www.cs.princeton.edu/…/Authors/Dickinson.shtml




Who's commenting?